Liberty Park Press

Liberty Park Press

  • Headlines
  • Politics
  • levitra for sale online
  • http://libertyparkpress.com/ordering-cialis-gel/
  • non prescription cialis
  • cialis or viagra
  • Sports

Did Feinstein Quote Heller Out of Context to Play ‘Gotcha?’

March 22, 2017 By Dave Workman

Screen Capture – YouTube, C-SPAN3

Updated 3/23 — Has a veteran anti-gun Democrat U.S. Senator planted a seed of doubt about the Second Amendment, and a landmark Supreme Court ruling, to mislead the public about what the amendment protects?

During questioning Tuesday of Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein posed the following question:

“In D.C. v. Heller, the majority opinion written by Justice (Antonin) Scalia recognized that, and I’m quoting, ‘Of course the Second Amendment was not unlimited,’ end quote. Justice Scalia wrote, for example, laws restricting access to guns by the mentally ill or laws forbidding gun possession in schools were consistent with the limited nature of the Second Amendment. Justice Scalia also wrote that, ‘Weapons that are more useful in military service, M-16 rifles and the like, may be banned’ without infringing on the Second Amendment. Do you agree with that statement that under the Second Amendment weapons that are most useful in military service … may be banned?” (Emphasis added)

But that’s not exactly what the 2008 Heller ruling stated, as written by the late Justice Scalia. Indeed, Feinstein’s quote appears to be out of context, and instead may reflect her predisposition toward banning so-called “assault weapons” that are merely look-alikes but are semi-automatic modern sport/utility rifles.

Here’s the full text of the paragraph as written by Justice Scalia in the 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller:

“It may be objected that if weapons that are most useful in military service—M-16 rifles and the like—may be banned, then the Second Amendment right is completely detached from the prefatory clause. But as we have said, the conception of the militia at the time of the Second Amendment’s ratification was the body of all citizens capable of military service, who would bring the sorts of lawful weapons that they possessed at home to militia duty. It may well be true today that a militia, to be as effective as militias in the 18th century, would require sophisticated arms that are highly unusual in society at large. Indeed, it may be true that no amount of small arms could be useful against modern-day bombers and tanks. But the fact that modern developments have limited the degree of fit between the prefatory clause and the protected right cannot change our interpretation of the right.”

Was Feinstein playing “Gotcha” with Judge Gorsuch while at the same time misleading the working press – which wouldn’t take the time to read through the 2008 Heller ruling to find the actual text – and/or the public?

Whichever the case, a careful reading of Scalia’s actual language does not appear to endorse banning such firearms at all.

But in the end, it is the reader who must decide what Justice Scalia was saying, and whether what Feinstein said he was saying is an accurate analysis.

Related:

Anti-Gunners Fearful Of Gorsuch On Gun Rights

Judiciary Dems Confirm Animosity toward 2A in Gorsuch Hearing

 

Facebook Comments

Related

Filed Under: 2nd Amendment, News Feed Tagged With: Antonin Scalia, Dianne Feinstein, Gun control, heller ruling, Neil Gorsuch, Senate Judiciary

About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is an award-winning career journalist with an expertise in firearms and the outdoors. He is the author of several books dealing with firearms politics. He has a degree in editorial journalism from the University of Washington and is a lifelong Washington resident.

Please Subscribe

We respect your email privacy

Powered by AWeber Email Marketing

 

Featured Stories

Disruption at Hearing on ATF Flip; Witness Puts Condescension on Display

OR Gun Control Dilemma: ‘No Evidence Criminals Would Obey’

Criminal charges filed against women’s college basketball player following incident in postgame handshake line-UPDATED

The Challenge Of Identifying As A Monochromatic Effeminate Submarine Drone

President Biden’s Approval Rating Plummets in Two New Polls

St. Louis’s top prosecutor facing potential ouster from office

Opinion: Uvalde Cops Blame AR, Not Themselves

Device Worship And The Detriment Of Sports Competition

VIRAL STORIES

Don’t Look Now, But The Clock Is Ticking

Domino Bot Wows Internet

The Soviet Ghost Town Of The Arctic Expanse

These Insects Redefine “The Groove”

Colossal Pizza Slice Marks The End Of An Era

The Hardheaded And Plummeting Ratings Of Sports Television

Escaping The Madness- Where On Earth Does One Go To Avoid Bubonic Politicization?

Driving A Jet Engine Or Racing A Car? Choose Wisely

About Us

Liberty Park Press is an online information website dedicated to providing you with breaking, useful, or interesting information.

Read More

PRIVACY AND TERMS

Welcome to Libertyparkpress.com. If you continue to browse and use this website you are agreeing to comply with and be bound by the following terms and conditions of use:
Continue Reading…

CONTACT US

Liberty Park Press
12500 NE 10th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

Copyright © 2023 · Liberty Park Press Inc · all rights reserved · Log in