Affluent suburban dog moms are the absolute worst. At least in recalibrating the spectrum of extremism.
Over the last four decades, liberal PACS have spent billions of dollars in a blatant societal engineering campaign targeting the wealthy suburbs of major metropolitan areas, and framing viscerally laden concepts, such as victimhood, rape culture, equity and “gun violence” as issues perpetuated by the diabolical majority of white males with designs to keep females within a state of physical and psychological submission. As the old saying goes, “If a tree falls down in the forest, it was probably savagely downed by a white lumberjack stereotype of Caucasian misogynist supremacy which is an emblematic representation of cultural appropriation.” Thus, Weyerhaeuser is a corporate bastion of processing hate as 2 + 2= 5, or whatever sum the party wants it to be.
The venture has evidently paid off, at least according to the voting trends, and progressives now dominate local councils and school boards, as basic freedoms disappear, and the traditional family unit faces civic sanctions for simply owning property, or placing their children at the whim of the indoctrinating public school system.
The caveat to the extremism is that sensible voters just endured the wool being pulled over their collective eyes as the radical Democrat career politicians, first controversially elected in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s and then defeated by progressives over the last four years, are now again in office as the lesser of two evils in one of the biggest schemes in modern politics. Coupled with the propensity for the demagogues to regurgitate policy from the early 20th century that didn’t work then, and certainly does not work now, tax-payers face the full brunt force of dystopia that the average individual has no voting power in nullifying the deplorable consequences of draconian legislation.
And the dog moms were front and center in insufferable and hypnotic groupthink allowing for the ruse facilitated by unfettered Democratic political strategists facilitating elitists to attack fundamental liberties. The money and resources wasted to untangle the mess utilizing the legal system is simply an afterthought to those with a belief system that a billion dollars is a drop in the proverbial bucket. But who cleans up the poop?
This unsettling phenomenon is being played at in real time in the cozy confines of West Hollywood as a national template of totalitarianism, where Generation-X abolitionist candidates have yielded their 2020 election victories to the old guard of the ideological wrecking crew complicit in building the base model to embrace criminals as victims of the system, while ostracizing law enforcement. The irreverent pair of Wambaugh’s cop surfing enthusiasts of Flotsam and Jetsam would not approve of the trajectory of municipal activism politics codified into law, or the overlords who hold them sacred.
During the recent election cycle, the outgoing crop of extremist public servants quietly gave traditional liberal Democrats a behind the scenes fist-bump and mouthed “you’re welcome” as the Ponzi scheme of special interest politics is the gift that just keeps on giving. Cue the corporatized media and the indifference to objectivity and the pursuit of truth.
The iconic face of the “Californicaiton” defining ideology in the affluent West Hollywood, activist John Heilman, was once again elected to the city council by the reprehensible peanut-gallery of residents after a two-year hiatus, and mainstream newsrooms are proclaiming the career politician as a moderate, when in fact the opposite is true. A Los Angeles times headline ran declaring “Moderate Incumbents Defeating Young Progressives in WeHo Election”. It should be noted that the West Hollywood election process incorporates the controversial ranked-choice voting system, protocol that many critics find conducive to questionable election numbers.
One of the candidates responsible for the temporary political demise of Heilman in the 2020 race is a queer Iranian immigrant and brandished a radicalized agenda that only the checks and balances of nearly broken civic framework prevented inevitable damage to policy. Interestingly, Heilman previously appointed the victor to the city’s Business License Commission, a clear indication that politics do in fact make strange bedfellows, or in this case an example of ideological symbiosis.
Heilman, who spent 36 years in office after first winning the seat in 1984 (pardon the irony) as a 27-year-old gay civil rights attorney, has been restored a blank checkbook for latitude in displaying tyrannical characteristics to assert his authority over passive aggressive citizens passively brainwashed and protected by the indelible cadre of dog moms. The narrative is so disgusting that not even the trash heap mountain ranges defying plate tectonics littering the sidewalks in the chaotic downtowns of Los Angeles, Portland, or Seattle, can match the reboant aesthetics of filthy disarray. According to Heilman’s campaign website, he will lobby for the hiring of social workers, rather than law enforcement, and allocate tax-payer funded resources to enable the homeless, a formula that morphs neighborhoods into a wasteland of crime. His take the Second Amendment is even more disturbing, and in 2018 he called for the enactment of federal gun control measures. But apparently fringe ideology is defined by the LA Times as centrist.
While crumbling infrastructure of liberal sanctuaries are only exacerbated by the abundance of dog moms, H1-B visa workers, and special interests, the quality of life for reasonable citizens diminishes, as public safety decays. Police, targeted and demonized by progressives oblivious to reality continually voting in adversarial characters such as Heilman, who refuse to prosecute criminals, are forced to stand idly by, or seek new careers, as crime spikes, and law-abiding have little recourse as the tide of blue surges and threatens the sanctity of once peaceful neighborhoods.
Unfortunately, for the sake of the near future, the frontlines of the ideological battle are populated by the naive, yet influential dog mom lobby who possess the political common sense of a traditional undecided voter referring to the Electoral College as the “electrical college” (thank you Homer Simpson). As the maternal instinct has been redirected towards the four-legged furry member of the household, public miscreants such as Heilman and the Stalin-conjuring Kshama Sawant will continue to dominate the political latticework, as apathy and forced compassion are the driving forces along with subversion in a prevailing idiocy stifling free will and innovation.
In employing a logical Venn diagram to illustrate the insanity of the political circus, not all dog moms are nefarious, it’s just that the most nefarious ones shriek the loudest drowning out the sorrowful whining of their pets glaring helplessly at a stranger in the hope of being rescued from a prevailing nightmare. The scene pathetically rivals any contemporary city council or schoolboard meeting that inevitably erupts in heated shouting match, usually followed by an arrest.