Liberty Park Press

Liberty Park Press

  • Headlines
  • Politics
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Tech
  • Life
  • Money
  • Sports

Diamond And Silk UNLOAD On Facebook When They Find Out Why They’re Being CENSORED! [VIDEO]

April 8, 2018 By Lilly Trevelyan

Diamond and Silk were furious when they discovered the reason for Facebook’s censorship of their content.  They learned the truth Friday night after the social media giant finally responded to their many inquiries.

The dynamic duo boast over 1.2 million Facebook followers on their main Diamond and Silk page.

The Gateway Pundit reports,

Diamond and Silk say their reach on Facebook has dramatically reduced prompting them to seek answers from Facebook.

After giving them the runaround for months, Facebook responded with, “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community.”

Even worse, Facebook said their ‘decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.’

In a Friday evening tweetstorm, Diamond and Silk told their fans why Facebook is censoring their very popular page.

Tweetstorm began with: .@DiamondandSilk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with @facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page. Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and……

.@DiamondandSilk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with @facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page. Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and……

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

“……. giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage. Here is the reply from……….

.@DiamondandSilk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with @facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page. Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and……

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

….Facebook. Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:40 PM: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community.” Yep, this was FB conclusion after 6 Months, 29 days, 5 hrs, 40 minutes and 43 seconds. Oh and guess what else…

….Facebook. Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:40 PM: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community.” Yep, this was FB conclusion after 6 Months, 29 days, 5 hrs, 40 minutes and 43 seconds. Oh and guess what else…

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

…Facebook said: “This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.” (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)

So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?

…Facebook said: “This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.” (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to us.)

So our questions to Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) are:
1. What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump?
2…..

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

…..Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
3. When you say “community” are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?

…..Our FB page has been created since December 2014, when exactly did the content and the brand become unsafe to the community?
3. When you say “community” are you referring to the Millions who liked and followed our page?
4. What content on our page was in violation?
5….

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

…..If our content and brand was so unsafe to the community, why is the option for us to boost our content and spend money with FB to enhance our brand page still available? Maybe FB should give us a refund since FB censored our reach.

…..Lastly, didn’t FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?

This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!

~Diamond and Silk

…..Lastly, didn’t FB violate their own policy when FB stopped sending notifications to the Millions of people who liked and followed our brand page?

This is deliberate bias censorship and discrimination. These tactics are unacceptable and we want answers!

~Diamond and Silk pic.twitter.com/wQqtub8Ges

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) April 7, 2018

The duo did not state whether they will be moving forward with litigation against Facebook, however; they stated they want answers.

We Smell A Class Action Lawsuit.
This…. S.ugar H.oney I.ce T.ea have got to stop.
YouTube……Google, this does not look good! pic.twitter.com/0GTE0wb6c3

— Diamond and Silk® (@DiamondandSilk) August 10, 2017

They are messing with the wrong ladies. We’ve got your back Diamond And Silk. https://t.co/UZTJDCGzQ0

— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) August 10, 2017

How sad in America that only conservatives get investigated, fired, boycotted and attacked. Double standard, & liberal silence is repulsive!

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) August 10, 2017

Diamond and Silk rose in popularity during the 2016 presidential election.

They regularly appeared on Fox News and other outlets showing their support for Donald Trump.

The two ladies were also seen on the campaign trail stumping for Trump.

YouTube also recently demonetized Diamond and Silk’s videos.

The tech giants needs to be broken up. They have a monopoly over information shared online and they are deliberately discriminating against conservatives.

The first time Trump met the ladies on the campaign trail he called them an internet sensation and told them he hopes they’ve monetized on their popularity.

Facebook Comments

Filed Under: Life

Please Subscribe

We respect your email privacy

Powered by AWeber Email Marketing

 

Featured Stories

Second Amendment Foundation Marks 52 Years Defending 2A

Another Chromosomal Controversy And The Pending Collapse of Journalism In Modern Times

Commerce Dept. to Congress: No Evidence Microstamping is Reliable

Anti-gunners Hilariously Claim the CDC is Wrong, the Gun Violence Archive is Right

A Prevalence Of Waste- Lyme Disease Prevails

Idaho Atty. Gen. Labrador Wants Grizzly Bears Removed from ESA

Tate Adamiak Has Been in Prison Longer Under President Trump than Under Biden

Federal Judge: ATF’s ‘Frame and Receiver Rule’ Unconstitutional

VIRAL STORIES

Don’t Look Now, But The Clock Is Ticking

Domino Bot Wows Internet

The Soviet Ghost Town Of The Arctic Expanse

These Insects Redefine “The Groove”

Colossal Pizza Slice Marks The End Of An Era

The Hardheaded And Plummeting Ratings Of Sports Television

Escaping The Madness- Where On Earth Does One Go To Avoid Bubonic Politicization?

Driving A Jet Engine Or Racing A Car? Choose Wisely

LATEST NEWS

Another Chromosomal Controversy And The Pending Collapse of Journalism In Modern Times

Commerce Dept. to Congress: No Evidence Microstamping is Reliable

Anti-gunners Hilariously Claim the CDC is Wrong, the Gun Violence Archive is Right

A Prevalence Of Waste- Lyme Disease Prevails

Idaho Atty. Gen. Labrador Wants Grizzly Bears Removed from ESA

Idaho Atty. Gen. Labrador Wants Grizzly Bears Removed from ESA

Tate Adamiak Has Been in Prison Longer Under President Trump than Under Biden

Federal Judge: ATF’s ‘Frame and Receiver Rule’ Unconstitutional

AG Blanche Finalizes New Restoration-of-Rights Process

Political Polling: Less than 30% Trust the Results

Color Blindness- The Latest Scheme Of Subterfuge

Jabbing Back: 46% Wanted Contempt Charges Against Fauci

SAF Settles Carry Case v. LA County Sheriff; Seeks Injunction Against CA Glock Ban

OR Gubernatorial Candidate Proposes Constitutional Amendment to Protect Hunting

Silence As Usual: Anti-Gunners Ignore Armed Citizen Intervention in Idaho

Rasmussen: 62% ‘Continue to Support SAVE Act’

About Us

Liberty Park Press is an online information website dedicated to providing you with breaking, useful, or interesting information.

Read More

TRENDING NEWS

Armed Citizen Hailed as Hero for Engaging, Distracting Idaho Killer

Spanberger Fund Raiser: Did VA Governor Miss Headlines?

Seattle Mayor Announces Plan to Combat Violent Crime: Gun Control

Women’s Professional Basketball- A Condescending Tale

Anti-gun Law Professors Seek to Cloud a Clear Issue

OR Anti-Hunting Initiative Fails Count, Not on November Ballot!

Panic Mode? Report Says NJ Lawmakers Consider Next Moves on Gun Control

‘Gun Violence Prevention’= The New Gun Control Camouflage

Rasmussen: Political Intolerance Affecting Friends, Family Relationships

The 7-Eleven Of Career And Love

3rd Circuit Blockbuster: New Jersey Rifle, Magazine Bans Unconstitutional

The Future Of Television News- Willful Ignorance

Can U.S. Get Used to Notion of DOJ Defending Second Amendment?

Michigan Dem. Senator Slotkin says SAVE Act would Defeat Democrats

The Inverse Of Trickle Up Hate

Judge Roger Benitez to Keynote Gun Rights Policy Conference in Dallas

PRIVACY AND TERMS

Welcome to Libertyparkpress.com. If you continue to browse and use this website you are agreeing to comply with and be bound by the following terms and conditions of use:
Continue Reading…

CONTACT US

Liberty Park Press
12500 NE 10th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

Copyright © 2026 · Liberty Park Press Inc · all rights reserved · Log in