With the censoring mechanism disable among social media platforms, propaganda continues to plague the digital sphere as hate and rumor trickle upwards defying physics and morphing truth.
Reality or the recognition of fact has become an obscurity leading to an absence of mollification within politics as first with bots and now with AI combined with widespread gullibility has completely tainted the news cycle and the dissemination of information and a quality of content that would be better categorized as a progeny of refuse and could mercifully referred to as refuse.
Political slang is the future shock nightmare of the Information age encyclopedia grooming the younger generations for an impending disaster amid false pretenses and unfilled promises. It is all about overbearing government and increased taxation.
Politicians on both sides of the spectrum are becoming increasingly disparaging in posting content designed to divide the country by enraging citizens through incendiary rhetoric. While the Trump factor is the underlying current in stoking mainstream derision, politicians and staff members are using time and money to fire off electronic messages back and forth which is egregiously on the tax-payer dime.
Apparently elected officials are now editorialists instead of lawmakers
Washington state First Congressional district Representative Suzan DelBene and staff fit the definition of digital antagonism as the attacks on Trump, curiously in the wake of Seattle hosting World Cup soccer matches defied even the fundamental tenets of logic. Her anti-White House diatribes among a fiefdom of affluent neighborhoods in the Puget Sound region included harsh criticism of the President on the publicly traded and privately-owned entity of F***book in bold and brash polarizing fashion that is typical of hardcore Democrats.
Apparently, active lawmakers can spread propaganda on a next level platform within the context of ideological cannibalism and essentially lobbying while holding a public office, which borders on ethics violations, morality, and what can be construed as legal.
Again, these tactics are not confined to one party and present a stern warning that the trajectory of society is not necessarily veering in a direction that favors productivity and solace.
