Two concepts emanating from Paris are now inmates of the past, the sleek and innovative flying missile that was the Concorde supersonic experience, and the costly US affiliation with the UN policy climate change madhouse of the Paris Agreement. A treaty calibrated to suffocate the global economy by allegedly reducing the carbon footprint by indirectly boosting pollution levels, a nonsensical venture which Trump and advisors exposed for what it is, and made a grand exit not compatible with the subtleties and subtitles of the Parisian elites.
The stereotypical decorated and snide cultural nuances of classical French society are afforded justifiable leniency by recognizing a rich and illustrious historical cultural tapestry decorated by the arts, scientific discoveries, and decapitating regicide. Nepotism at one point remained the quandary for the burgeoning nation and a complete immersion within the industrial revolution and the adoption of free markets. In the age of romanticism, the unhealthy obsession and worship of the natural world forged a lingering dichotomy between preservation and modernization, and laid the groundwork for the contemporary heated conflict pitting idealists against realists. The ugliness of this bitter battle is illustrated appropriately by the sanctimonious lingering regal mentality within proximity to Paris, and the associated vortex of climatological fundamentalism which afflicts the entire planet. Not surprisingly, the Paris Agreement, the most counterproductive of environmental directives, and a template for unchecked government oversight, was created in this highly charged environment conducive to crippling policy based on the premise of good feelings and not attainable goals.
As the faint echoes of self-serving royalty tussles with the current sparkling wall of vehicle lights from the tens of millions of commuters comprised of the Yellow Vest movement, normal people simply trying to drive to their jobs and support themselves and their families, the challenge to sensibility derives from the cultural elites and reaches the soft impressionable underbelly of the pseudo-intellectuals, before transforming into viral dogma. Retched and raw environmentalism, the key to all of life’s problems. The ongoing struggle stemming from reinforced government regulations over heavily taxed vehicular restrictions, and the conveniently fluidic definitions applied towards which state of the climate address should be employed depending on the hour or the day, highlighted wavering policies of the Green New Deal.
With the United States formally withdrawing from the Paris Agreement after a half decade of justified skepticism from those advocating for reason and efficiency, and dutifully rebuking an impossible and environmental pact painfully welding the Atlas burden of the idealistic and financial considerations on the economy, the battle has merely commenced to resist the severe consequences of radicalized climatology. Originally, 179 countries signed up for the multi-level-marketing scam in 2015, with the US and other industrialized nations bending over backwards and paying for the extensive tab at the end of the night. The unrealistic timeline of a 35-year window established to pressure the industrial and energy sector into gifting fortunes to the Green marketplace by 2050, also featured mandates limiting basic freedoms and liberties. Obama got America into a costly mess, and even managed to warp the Endangered Species Act to new and sickening heights damming private property owners, and Trump set the country free by firing a quantum phaser weapon blasting a 747-hanger sized crater into the side of the UN building.
The overdue move on all levels of common sense and socioeconomic considerations in retracting vulnerable compartments from a certain paradigm of doom, is lost on the listless bloviations of the so-called experts, appointed from the legions of overeducated and failed policy makers and journalists. The UN’s most recent climate report included a full chapter devoted to explaining the incomplete set of thematic data points leading to assumptions in popular AI climate models, and the strict indictment that humankind is responsible for a bevy of observable changes in the climate. Of course, the mainstream syndicates for liberal guilt, The Washington Post, and the New York Times, failed to print the full disclosure that “even though we believe that human-induced climate change is real, the numbers do not support our calculated assumptions.” The controversy is not surprising considering the directive of Jeff Bezos to admonish carbon emissions, the campaign officially kicked off in buying the naming rights to Seattle’s new National Hockey League arena, and adorning the building with the namesake of “Climate Pledge Arena”.
The current server capacity of the entire computing infrastructure lacks the required processing power, or a feasible energy source to either evaluate twenty thousand centuries into the past or the future with acceptable accuracy, as AI models tend to breakdown due to the staggering amount and exponential weight of applicable data. Dreams should exist through science fiction and thought experiments, but humans will never be able to catch up to time, and recreate life or history against the infinite variables of an infinite universe meant for deities and not for mortals.
Thus, the simple goal is to engage and detract with simplistic addictive plots that rival the intrigue surrounding the curious mesmerizing cupcake freeway accident addictive gawking sideshows of the Donahue show in the mid 1980’s. While the credibility was lacking, the narrative was expertly framed by the present. When misunderstood and unsubstantiated research findings are revered by popular cultural and elevated to a level of iconic indifference of a slogan serving an agenda offering the key to instant gratification, damage control is nearly impossible. And the digital prairie has entitled the common man with a F***book graduate level education, or provided an oratory skillset thanks to YouTube. The light on theory approach to upselling lucrative pessimism, is just one glaring example of why the US is fortunate to no longer be bound to the dumpster fire of the Paris Agreement.
It just doesn’t make sense considering that the tech and gig economy are reliant on heavy industries to turn profits, and the transformation from analogy to digital system requires heavy magnitudes of energy to support manufacturing and logistics in satisfying the insatiable appetites of a world sustained by instant gratification, and the Amazon phenomenon of incessant consumerism.
In the aftermath of a cartoon spoof featuring secular humanist Henry Kissinger hilariously misplacing his iconic eyeglasses within the bowels of the Springfield nuclear power plant during a classic Simpsons animated caper, global warming has morphed into climate change, which has gravitated to climate emergency, as billions of dollars are at stake for Al Gore and numerous investors earning regal fortunes in praying on the fears and visceral proclivities of the masses. Kissinger’s cartoon iteration, knocks on the door of the mausoleum style office of C. Montgomery Burns to inquire about the fate of his lost spectacles, all while thinking to himself in a near panic how the facilitator of the Paris Peace Accord ends up in monolithic catacombs of a nuclear institution on the verge of Chernobyl disaster, endured the misfortune of a comedic bathroom blunder.
With the concept of Paris being the theme on a superficial level, and reasonable metaphor for Kissinger’ influence on foreign diplomacy, to the current state of the Paris Agreement, and the ramifications on the future of the global economy directly correlating with the guilt factor from the first world, the “city of lights” periodically represents a misnomer to its label, as the ambiguity of darkness emanates from furtive bureaucratic policy which looks good on paper, but cannot withstand the test of reality. As the function of “peace” in the Paris Peace Accord is a misnomer to the written and spoken meaning of the misleading title, the Paris Agreement insinuates a global collaboration of unison in superficially battling climate change, which is a highly questionable idea, while indirectly lining the pockets of George Soros and Gore operatives. The pretended symphony of adroitly performed reactionary scientific approximations masterfully intertwined with raw emotions in humanizing policy propagating from the fear left over from the mini ice age of the 1970’s, and a phobia of refrigerators. Thanks to the proliferation of digital technology and instant communication, traditionally debunked or flawed research hypotheses find credence among the massive vapid and naive electronic hive mind of trendy and misplaced idealism. As a result, the unsustainable and costly presence of the US within the Paris Agreement reached an arduous and ungodly impasse, rivaling the sordid dynamics of between a suburban heroin user and a casual professional dealer, and the Trump administration yelled, “Enough!”.
The protocols or methods of North Korea or Indonesia aside from being at the most laughable stewards for the environment, the scam of the international diplomatic phenomenon that dictates the wealthiest countries absorb the majority of the cost, the world is not a better place because of this ridiculous mentality. With the US out, the UK, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand absorb the brunt of the total cost for progressive environmental policy against the inability of other nations to contribute to the elaborate scheme, the narrative is not unlike a tipsy lazy buffoon in union-supported middle management job earning the same as a competent and hard co-worker. The audacity to penalize strong economies applying sensible environmental practices is simply a mindless kneejerk overreaction to the shame an embarrassment of allowing dictators, totalitarian regimes, and junk science to foster a third world tier of nations and peoples struggling for survival. Saying and not doing is a popular building block of bureaucracy, and the official detachment from the Paris agreement spawns hope that certain governments still act, and dollars saved are spent wisely on worthy issues that require more immediate attention.
The irony is not lost on the entire gamut of elected officials attending ceremonies and flying the high altitude airwaves to spread propaganda, and in doing so taking an unofficial hypocritical oath against their insufferable platform of wishing to control the behavior of others. While self-appointed neighborhood groups cannibalize suburban cul-des-sacs and hold pitchfork and tribunal torch mobs on trash pickup day, and blatantly ignored the Beijing Olympic algae bloom, the possibility exists for the elevation of “climate change” to a screaming level or alarmism. The label itself is worth a few hundred thousand Bitcoin and will certainly clear a pathway for Biden and Harris to do their worst in gorging on mountains of useful rhetoric that incites a certain demographic of the populace, a segment of voters who have no problem with spending other people’s money, and pilfering time and energy, without any consideration for running a thorough cost-benefit analysis. Sentiment is expensive no matter how it is spun, and the new administration will do their worst to reverse the gains of the last four years.
This editorial is powered by search engine that cares about privacy- Duckduckgo.com