Students take in a lecture at a French university campus.
The manicured snarky demeanor of the French culture remains a known quantity, the misandrist chauvinism beckoning a false subtlety and grace that defies even the most extreme disposition of shrieking arrogance. With the Yellow vest movement burgeoning, as the middle class reacts to the prevalence of overeducated pseudo-intellectuals too smart to adopt sensible policy in accommodating a siege of modern commuters, the nation faces a prolonged bout of turmoil more painstaking than losing a piece of ear cartilage in a boxing match. Referencing the aforementioned societal crux of alpha dominated obliviousness brandishing a good old fashioned tipsy cabernet groupthink soiree, the already stodgy fraternity of academia resorts to changing written history, while taking the obligatory retched low hanging fruit pot shot at the US.
Of course, a history professor is at the top of a pointy end of Mayan pyramid in the latest scandal of incredulous rhetoric that is unfortunately tainting the minds of undergraduate students, a breach of trust that is completely inappropriate and egregiously mistimed in a world battling growing rift between facts and perception. Jean Pierre-Rocher, apparently is not a fan of Uncle Sam or the rugged brand of patriotism proliferating across the Atlantic, and he published a blatant lie in the style and indecency of CNN staging a breaking news event. The biased professor insinuated within the pages of an alleged factual history text that the September 11th attack was a CIA operation.
“This global event – no doubt orchestrated by the CIA (secret services) to impose American influence on the Middle East? – hit the symbols of American power on its own territory.”
Once again the unwelcome malady of a reckless editorial convolutes what should be an interpretation of facts.
The inaccurate and reprehensible statement within the book was reported by a student to the publisher, prompting a series action.
The publisher acted swiftly and with noble purpose in releasing a public statement apologizing for the fabrication of history and ensuring that all future editions of Rocher’s book will be properly edited to omit the ubiquitous claim. And at least students know what to look for in navigating through the flagged text. However, not all is well on the scenic roads of the Tour de France of retributions, as the peloton reality that the offensive version of the text are still lurking and percolating throughout classrooms and libraries. Even with the onset of damage control, students are still being indoctrinated by the suggestion of an intellectually dishonest conspiracy theory which averts even the faintest elements of credibility and decency.
Throughout history, seemingly trivial events at the time are actually indicators of more trouble on the horizon.
This is truly a disconcerting and sobering incident within an environment where opinions and reactions are circulating throughout the entirety of academia, and threating the very notion of facts backed by empirical and historical evidence. A 2018 study of American students found that a third of millennials believe the earth is flat, and with the internet and social media teeming with cooked-up theories defying reality, there is no simple solution in tearing away the younger generations from the servitude of a harmful fantasy world facilitated by the instant gratification addiction to the smartphone.
French citizens and middle class vehicle commuters battle against rising fuel costs and increases in associated road taxes.
As the clinging hopes and false promises of a planet partially dictated by an insidious narrative and identity politics spawning the worship of speculation over the pursuit of truth in the forwarding of an agenda brutalizes known history, the future is bleak in propagating reason. Unfortunately, the legacy of the British elitists enamored by every move of the father of the Soviet state during the arduous trials of the WWI, gallivanting in the comforts of luxurious train cars hosted by savage revolutionaries during height and horror of the inhuman trench warfare. The participants composing inconceivable sonnets of reverence to the oligarchs, marks the circuitous mode of ceaseless repetition to hammer an argument home in the dawn of the information age. While the faces have evil have transformed, the insufferable timeless template of vitriol and subversion remains one in the same.
Given a moment in a time, and a fleeting instance of essence, the very trials and traditions of humankind stoking the will of existence and survival to progress under God’s will are at the mercy of delineating martyrs consumed with the convenient reconstruction of history for the sake of attaining ultimate control. The Orwellian lexicon of “Who controls the past, controls the future”, has never before faced an existential impasse throughout history, as the current iteration of deconstructive maniacal material adopted by the “Thought Police” literally changes the timeline for population demographics oblivious to the harsh consequences of ignorance.
With the full force of the professional academic peloton a tedious thirty seconds behind the founding principles of freedoms and liberties, and gaining unbelievable ground in the waning moments of the race for the sanctity and the ultimate prize of pervading ideology, universal faces grimaced and salivating in anticipation of victory, the time is now for an orchestrated resistance to the chaos and whispering insanity of a pending purge. The Pierre-Rocher’s of the radical resistance to reasonability can only get so far before the natural corrective properties of the universe step into the ring and demand a system of checks and balances to mitigate the extremism fabricated by a group of individuals in the pathetic attempt to alter the known quantities of an interactive system customizable to the happiness of the individual. The instance of revisionist history has not been witnessed in such a disgusting magnitude since the propaganda of Lenin and Trotsky in justifying the bloody Bolshevik revolution and tens of millions massacred for the sake of ideology.
Thank you random conspiracy theorists of YouTube for bending the bars of belief to the extent where a foolish educator can provide video “evidence” to formative minds, that the moon landing was a hoax, or “false flag operations” are responsible for 9/11 or Pearl Harbor. While “seeing is believing”, when will the craziness explode into a crescendo of full-scale subjectivity?
This editorial powered by duckduckgo.com